My article "Piano Competition : Quo Vadis?" at KOMPAS March 2 (in Indonesian)

Yesterday, one of Indonesia's most popular newspaper KOMPAS published my article, and I'm posting it here. It is in Indonesian, so if you wanna read it in your own language, please use google translate. Not that it's accurate, but it gives you an idea of what it is :) . .............................................................................................................................................. Kompetisi Piano, Quo Vadis ? .............................................................................................................................................. Mulai banyak kompetisi piano yang diadakan di tanah air, menyusul iklim musik sastra (istilah yg saya rasa lebih tepat daripada "musik klasik") yang sangat hangat dan aktif saat ini. Tak dapat dihindari pergerakannya ke arah positif dan negatif. Pendidikan musik pada umumnya di usia yang sangat muda (dibawah 10 tahun) dalam artian membaca not balok dan memainkan instrumen (bukan hanya piano) memang bukan bertujuan utama untuk membuat anak-anak itu menjadi musikus di kemudian harinya, tapi lebih ke pengaktifan otak yang lebih intuitif dan kreatif, sehingga mereka akan berkembang sebagai individu yang lebih peka, bukan hanya empatis, tapi juga dalam melaksanakan kualitas pekerjaan mereka yang sering tidak berhubungan sama sekali dengan seni. Dari pendidikan tersebut, sering secara tidak sengaja ditemukan bakat-bakat musik yang kadang luar biasa yang diharapkan dapat menjadi musikus handal dikemudian harinya, di mana modal bakat saja tentu tidak cukup untuk itu. .............................................................................................................................................. Kompetisi piano adalah salah satu wadah dimana mereka dapat menantang kualitas dirinya sendiri. Dua kata terakhir itu yang perlu diingat : dirinya sendiri. Pada dasarnya kompetisi seni apapun tidak dapat disamakan dengan kompetisi olahraga, dimana sang kompetitor memiliki "lawan" atau "rival" karena bagaimanapun subyektivitas para juri ikut memegang peran. Yang bermain musik Tschaikovsky dengan tempo lebih cepat belum tentu menang, tidak seperti di kolam renang. Yang penekanan tuts pianonya paling kuat juga belum tentu menang karena ini bukan olahraga gulat. Bahkan yang meleset memencet tuts piano pun belum tentu terkurangi nilainya, sedangkan di olahraga panah, jika anak panah tidak tepat sasaran nilainya akan berkurang. Oleh karena itu, di ajang seperti ini sang peserta diharapkan berkompetisi dengan kualitasnya sendiri, dengan perbedaan antara apa yang diharapkannya sebelum naik panggung dan kenyataan yang terjadi di panggung , seberapa besar aspirasi artistiknya bisa direalisasikan di depan penonton dan juri. .............................................................................................................................................. Jadi, apakah tidak ada standar atau kriteria dalam penilaian juri? Tentu saja ada, hanya saja semua kriteria tersebut berhenti pada tahap teknik permainan serta pengetahuan akademik. Dan kriteria-kriteria tersebut sudah 70-80% terpenuhi oleh teknik permainan yang makin membaik oleh para pianis muda Indonesia saat ini. Setelah semua kriteria ini terpenuhi, saatnya "selera" memegang peranan. Masalahnya mulai timbul jika kompetisi dijadikan ajang "rebutan murid" oleh para guru musik yang nota bene menjadi juri di kompetisi tersebut. Dan "selera" ini bisa saja diinterpretasi dengan subyektivitas yang memang tidak bisa dihindari, bukan hanya dari kualitas permainan, tapi menjalar jadinya ke "yang ini murid saya, jadi harus saya kasih nilai lebih tinggi daripada yang lain". Bagaimanapun, nama guru akan terangkat jika muridnya memenangkan sebuah kompetisi, apalagi yang bergengsi. Masalah lain, mungkin yang paling penting tapi sering dilupakan adalah jika juri adalah seorang pendidik tapi tidak merangkap seorang "performer" (dalam artian sebenarnya, bukan hanya bermain di depan murid-muridnya atau lingkungan sekolahnya), karena ia akan melupakan satu hal yang sederhana tapi penting : penonton datang ke konser untuk "disentuh hati"nya, bukan untuk mengontrol dengan stopwatch seberapa cepat sang pianis memainkan Chopin Etude serta menghitung jumlah tuts piano yang salah pencet. Kecepatan tempo, tingkat akurasi permainan yang tinggi dll. TIDAK menjamin tingginya nilai artistik sebuah permainan piano, seperti yang saya selalu tekankan (dan sulit diterjemahkan ke bahasa Indonesia) : Music serves to express, not to impress. .............................................................................................................................................. Indonesia sebagai salah satu pengguna terbesar media sosial di dunia , musik sastra-nya juga terwakili dengan begitu banyak pengikut Facebook dan twitter. Banyak sumber informasi yang di tulis oleh para amatir, dan beberapa dari mereka memberikan informasi (bukan hanya opini) yang kurang tepat. Dalam kasus ini hanya waktu lah yang dapat menyaring kualitas yang baik dari forum dan media tersebut yang saat ini tumbuh lebih dalam kuantitas daripada kualitas. .............................................................................................................................................. Penulis akui bahwa kompetisi bukanlah cara terbaik untuk membangun atmosfir kesenian , tetapi sampai sekarang , inilah satu-satunya cara untuk seorang musikus muda memulai karir di musik sastra , di mana kompetisi / audisi yang disaksikan publik umum menjadi sebuah platform di mana bakat seseorang ditemukan dan diakui . Jika ada metode yang lebih baik daripada audisi / kompetisi yang "fair", metode itu harus bisa menjawab dua pertanyaan ini : 1. Bagaimana seorang produser / penyelenggara acara / komponis mendapatkan dan menemukan musikus yang berkualitas, dan sebaliknya : 2. Bagaimana musikus yang berkualitas tapi tidak memiliki koneksi, uang yang cukup dan fasilitas lain mendapatkan kesempatan, atau "exposure" untuk bisa menunjukkan karyanya? Asumsi bahwa kompetisi / audisi itu seperti lagunya ABBA : "The winner takes it all, the loser has to fall" itu sama sekali tidak benar. Justru berdasarkan pengalaman saya mengadakan kompetisi piano internasional Ananda Sukarlan Award sejak 2008, terdapat fakta yang malah menguntungkan yang "kalah" seperti ini : .............................................................................................................................................. 1. Th 2008, Inge Buniardi memenangkan juara I, dan Edith Widayani pemenang II. Edisi berikutnya (2010), Edith Widayani menjadi pemenang pertama. Kini dua-duanya sedang melanjutkan kuliah di University of Kansas (Inge dalam program S3), dan Eastman School of Music (Edith program S2), dua perguruan tinggi yang "top" di AS, dan telah memulai karir sebagai pianis ke mancanegara. 2. Th. 2008, Randy Ryan memenangkan juara III, saat itu usianya baru 15 th. Ia ikut kompetisi lagi th. 2012, dan ia memenangkan juara I. Kini ia kuliah S1 di Juilliard School of Music, New York. Dua fakta ini tidak di"sengaja" terjadi, karena dewan juri setiap edisi berbeda, jadi mereka tidak mengenal siapa yang telah berpartisipasi di edisi sebelumnya. .............................................................................................................................................. Ketiga pianis yg saya sebut ini kini mendapatkan beasiswa dari universitasnya untuk kuliahnya. Kesimpulan yang dapat diambil adalah, sukses sering tidak tercapai langsung dalam satu kompetisi, "kegagalan" bukan berarti kiamatnya dunia tetapi memperkaya pengalaman. Itupun saya alami di masa-masa muda saya. .............................................................................................................................................. Dunia seni yang sangat menjunjung tinggi kualitas produknya tidak dapat lagi berkembang melalui nepotisme atau persahabatan semata. Betapapun cintanya anda terhadap istri atau anak anda (dan seringkali kasusnya merembet ke keponakan, sepupu bahkan tetangga), belum tentu ia dapat menjamin kualitas pertunjukan yang prima, betapapun besarnya usahanya dan niat baiknya selain untuk memberikan yang terbaik, juga untuk membahagiakan anda. Mengambil bagian dalam kompetisi dan bagaimana mempersiapkan diri untuk itu sekarang menjadi bagian yang tidak terpisahkan dari pendidikan musik , dan manfaatnya sekarang bahkan lebih bermakna , mengingat bahwa ada begitu banyak bisnis sekolah musik yang menawarkan pendidikan "instan", memenuhi banyak harapan orang tua kepada anak-anak mereka untuk menjadi "jenius " dalam bermain piano dalam waktu beberapa bulan. Kualitas seorang musisi hanya dapat dibuktikan dengan konser "live" atau rekamannya. Ekspresi yang ingin disampaikannya harus cukup dalam sehingga tidak dapat disampaikan dengan kata-kata, ucapan atau tulisan. Hanya melalui sebuah kompetisi atau audisi lah seseorang dapat menyajikan kualitasnya baik kepada masyarakat luas ataupun ke para ahli yang bertindak sebagai juri. Hanya melalui kualitas tinggi para musisi lah musik sastra kita akan tumbuh dan berkembang, dan dalam jangka panjang itu membuat musik sastra diterima , "dipahami" dan akhirnya dicintai. .............................................................................................................................................. Ananda Sukarlan, pianis & komponis, ketua dewan juri Ananda Sukarlan Award International Piano Competition. @anandasukarlan . http://anandasukarlanaward.wordpress.com

Virto .. virtuo.. what? (Thoughts on development of pianistic techniques)

The last few days have been grueling for me, practising my Rapsodias, some of them I've never played before. No no, not because I feel "examined" by the young pianists who are coming to my concert next Sunday who, most of them, have played or studied at least one Rapsodia of mine. They should not expect the composer to be the best interpreter of his own works, especially if we talk about the virtuosity (oh, oh, what an excuse eh, some of you might be thinking right now). We composers usually are too lazy to practice our own pieces, I personally feel much more responsibility in playing other people's work, not because they aren't mine, but because I always admire them more than my works. And I don't think this is due to the fact that the neighbour's grass is greener (except if your neighbour put lots of sh*t to fertilize it!), but because I always learn a lot from those works of Haydn, Rachmaninov, Busoni etc. They inspire me. The only thing I learned from studying my own pieces is what NOT to do in my next pieces :( .............................................................................................................................................. I have heard incredible performances by young(er) people on my Rapsodia, or other works of mine. And I haven't got used to Henoch Kristianto's new CD of my works, it is, for me, still admirable. Indeed, their virtuosity is stunning. But is that so unusual these days? Perhaps not. ............................................................................................................................................ The overall level of technical proficiency in instrumental playing, especially on the piano, has increased steadily over time. Many pianists and piano teachers friends of mine have noted the phenomenon, which is not unlike what happens in sports. Records keep being broken, barriers are renewed all the time. Something similar has long been occurring with pianists. And in the last decade or so the growth of technical proficiency has seemed exponential. ............................................................................................................................................ What long-term effect this trend will have on the field is not clear. Unlike in Asia, especially Indonesia where audience is growing, classical music in Europe is facing its challenges, including declining appreciation among the general (especially young) public, and not all segments of the audience are noticing the breakthrough in technical accomplishment that is apparent to insiders: pianists, concert presenters and piano freaks. Because so many pianists are so good, many concertgoers have simply come to expect that any soloist playing the Liszt or Tchaikovsky Concerto will be a phenomenal technician. A new level of technical excellence is expected of emerging pianists. I see it not just on the concert circuit but also at conservatories and colleges. In recent years, at my masterclasses or recital programs at some conservatories that I visited as guest teachers, I have repeatedly been struck by the sheer level of instrumental expertise that seems a given. Certainly a phenomenon is taking place. I remember back in 1990s when the movie “Shine,” about the mentally ill pianist David Helfgott, raised curiosity about Rachmaninov’s 3rd Piano Concerto, a Juilliard professor Jerome Lowenthal was asked by reporters whether this piece was as formidably difficult as the movie had suggested. He had two answers: “One was that this piece truly is terribly hard. Two was that all my 16-year-old students were playing it.” ............................................................................................................................................ What role do composers play in all this? A lot, I think. Along the history, composers always push at the boundaries: Someone creates a work of extraordinary difficulty that seems unplayable and then, simply because it exists, people rise to the occasion, and we find that it was indeed possible. But of course, it has to be the composers themselves first who had to prove it, unfortunately : at least Liszt and Busoni did. But has it always been like that? Nope, don't think so. Rachmaninov said about Vladimir Horowitz's playing of his 3rd concerto: "This is the way I always dreamed my concerto should be played, but I never expected to hear it that way on Earth" (I quote it from freerepublic.com, but apparently this statement appears in other pages too). Britten's excellent piano concerto, too, relied on Svjatoslav Richter for its formidable interpretation (by the way, do you know that the incredible recording that we know now was taken during a live performance?). It didn't take off that brilliantly when Britten himself premiered it. .............................................................................................................................................. I think a reason that pianists are getting technically stronger is that as in sports, young pianists are just learning to practice the craft better, becoming better conditioned and getting better results due to the toughness of competitions, and that pianists are rising to the challenges of new music that push boundaries. If we see it in historical context, the first several decades of the 20th century are considered a golden era by many piano buffs, a time when artistic imagination and musical richness were valued more than technical perfection. There were certainly pianists during that period who had exquisite, impressive technique, like Busoni and Rachmaninov. And white-hot virtuosos like the young Vladimir Horowitz wowed the public, but the audience tolerated a lot of playing that would be considered sloppy today. Listen to 1920s and ’30s recordings of the pianist Alfred Cortot, immensely respected in his day. He would probably not be admitted to any European conservatory now. Despite the refinement and élan in his playing, his recording of Chopin’s 24 études from the early 1930s is, by today’s standards, littered with clinkers. These days playing the Chopin études with comfort is practically a basic requirement for passing the first round of any competition. ............................................................................................................................................ There is a danger in pursuing perfection. After Van Cliburn won the 1958 Tchaikovsky Competition and became a household name, every young pianist saw competitions as the route to fame and success. A new generation worked tirelessly to achieve technical flawlessness. Critics found that many of these young pianists had “competition chops” but not much else to offer. During every era of the piano there were players who were superb artists with more on their minds than dazzling virtuosity. You might divide pianists into two basic groups: those who have the technique to play anything and those who have all the technique they need, thank you, to play the music that is meaningful to them.And now, since only in China itself there are more than 1 million young pianists who can play ALL the right notes, a new breed of pianists are searching something new. A new expressivity, a new kind of artistry, and a new kind of REPERTOIRE. The fact that they are all active right now suggests that a new level of conquering the piano is taking place. You could argue that younger performers are expanding the boundaries of technique in other instruments as well. But singers are the exception to this trend. One obvious reason is that while the instruments themselves have not changed that much in the last century, every voice is unique to a person and a body. Though there are certain time-tested principles, each singer must come to terms with his or her own voice.But let me tell you my opinions about singers later, after I finish my concert this Sunday. Right now, I have to struggle with those crazy jumping chords, strange arpeggios, weird running notes all modulating to places where no man have gone before. And unfortunately, all those problems are all created by me. As John Lennon put it, you might say I am a dreamer. But I'm not the only one.

"This Boy's had a dream" ; In memory of Prof. Dr. Fuad Hassan

Piano, piano. I've been quite pianistic these days. Writing 4-hand piano pieces for my daughter Alicia, started a two-piano piece and several etudes for piano solo. An email came last week from the Faculty of Psychology of Universitas Indonesia, asking me if I could contribute something for a concert commemorating our former minister of education, Mr. Fuad Hassan. He was the one who helped me with a scholarship to go to the Royal Conservatory of Den Haag, back in 1986. So I wrote the piece quickly (I was unusually inspired !), and wrote this program note :

A piece of music of mine to cherish the memory of our dear Prof. Dr. Fuad Hassan would be, inevitably, autobiographical. He was the person responsible for my musical education abroad, back in 1986, when things were really difficult for me. Without him, I wouldn't be where I am now. Sitting down writing the piece, my mind automatically travelled back to those years, when I was a teenager --to be precise, an ungrown-up boy. I had only dreams to follow, those kind of dreams where one could achieve anything if one really wants it. That, mixed with the uncertainties of a teenager, understanding (or not?) love for the first (few) times, the sentimental feeling of travelling far far beyond his birthplace, etcetra. Those things would sound unreal now, but were more than real in those days. Hence, "This Boy's Had a Dream" was born with an un-typical sentimentality that normally can't be found in my music. This, I feel, is the music this boy would write 20 years ago but didn't have the musical skill to write it down. Again, I hold Mr. Fuad Hassan responsible for the physical birth of this music, embedded in me for 20 years. It is unabashedly romantic, reflecting the Whitman-esque teenager not a bit tamed, untranslatable, sounding his barbaric yawp over the rooftops of the world. And Mr. Fuad Hassan understood my dreams, and realized them. Requiescat in pace, Mr. Fuad Hassan.